tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6279439214101571416.post4225927705715162383..comments2023-07-03T04:10:01.147-05:00Comments on Conservative Candor: Give Back Your Bonuses, Mr. PresidentBrandonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16435266043718496823noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6279439214101571416.post-12637928902679083942010-01-21T14:29:46.930-06:002010-01-21T14:29:46.930-06:00True! But I don't think PACs will go anywhere,...True! But I don't think PACs will go anywhere, although I'd have to read the court opinion.<br /><br />Individuals are still limited to contributing $4000 per year to a specific campaign, so PACs will still allow wealthy individuals to contribute above and beyond that $4000 limit.Brandonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16435266043718496823noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6279439214101571416.post-44357989322664056712010-01-21T13:18:59.513-06:002010-01-21T13:18:59.513-06:00Looks like they got rid of the loophole by strikin...Looks like they got rid of the loophole by striking down the law on corporate donations:<br /><br />http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/01/21/supreme-court-sides-hillary-movie-filmmakers-campaign-money-dispute/<br /><br />Doesn't change your post because it used to be a loophole until the Supreme court got rid of the law.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com